matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Angels)
[personal profile] matgb
Um, yeah. Loads of people reacting to it all over the place, and so far all good. Which I have to say I'm in agreement with. So, if you haven't watched it yet, be aware that a) it's a damn good story even if you're not a Doctor Who fan (or even if you generally dislike SF stuff anyway) and b) You can't vote in this poll until you have because, dude, spoilers. And I'm normally one who seeks out spoilers; if I'm telling you to watch it first, that means watch it first, damnit!

[Poll #1000593]

Right, that's it, time to go get some more coffee. Oh, the BBC site has the short story it's based on (that's two great stories in a row based on existing fiction), although I do concur with the person who said the online formatting is awful.
Depth: 1

Date: 2007-Jun-10, Sunday 16:50 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] js84.livejournal.com
I've only seen less than 20 episodes of DW in total, but it was the best out of those that I have seen. You could tell a lot more effort had gone into the script than the usual offerings. It did take a long time before the Doctor properly appeared, which suggested it might turn out to be another budget episode like the Olympics one where all the monsters are just off-screen shadows. Fortunately, it was done in such a way that it became clearer as it progressed. I didn't vote for the last 'Best bits' item as, although the statues are a very good idea, the ending that showed a lot of other statues wasn't believable as they had a quick shot of an ornamental dog in there too. What harm could that do?

Profile

matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Default)
Mat Bowles

September 2021

S M T W T F S
   1234
567 891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 2025-Jul-20, Sunday 01:40
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios