Entry tags:
Badgers and Govt "scientists"
Despite being vegetarian and broadly in favour of animal welfare attempts and being opposed to cruelty and unnecessary slaughter of animals, I've always been slightly ambivalent about badger culls and similar. When the reports earlier in the year indicated what we'd always suspected, that it didn't actually make a difference to the spread of bovine TB, I thought that might possibly be the end of it. It appears not.
My parents get The Telegraph. They used to get the Independent, but then I moved out and it went tabloid, plus Alex is in the Telegraph (or at least was). This mornings picture story is this: Cull badgers to fight TB, advises top scientist, and it's followd up by a comment peice on page two using that failure of a good argument, the appeal that Common sense demands badger cull. Fortunately, I have
tyrell paying attention, and he's done a nice little demolition job on the idiocy surrounding the story and the wonderful idea that a Govt advisor (specialty: chemistry) can spend a few months and thus dismiss a report by a professor of animal health, director of the institute of animal health and a study that took him ten years to complete.
Now, obviously, I might be missing something and I haven't had time to do much research, but, um, who would you believe? Oh, wait, it's DEFRA, they'll go with not-annoying-the-farmers approach rather than the slightly harder let's-tell-the-farmers-the-truth approach. Gah!
My parents get The Telegraph. They used to get the Independent, but then I moved out and it went tabloid, plus Alex is in the Telegraph (or at least was). This mornings picture story is this: Cull badgers to fight TB, advises top scientist, and it's followd up by a comment peice on page two using that failure of a good argument, the appeal that Common sense demands badger cull. Fortunately, I have
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Now, obviously, I might be missing something and I haven't had time to do much research, but, um, who would you believe? Oh, wait, it's DEFRA, they'll go with not-annoying-the-farmers approach rather than the slightly harder let's-tell-the-farmers-the-truth approach. Gah!
no subject
It's doing what the vocal people want—most people are against, but it won't change their vote, but farmers blockading and protesting causes them problems, and farmers seem convinced it's a badger issue—my Dad seems fairly sure as well.
no subject
But then farmers see badgers all the time, see they have TB, associate it with TB in their cattle and want to do something bout the problem on their doorstep rather than the problem with cattle movement or bio-security or vaccinations. In some ways understandable, in some ways really, really stupid.
Of course I'm more than willing to see the UK animal farming industry crash and burn, but that might be the best option for everyone else...
And yeah, my old posts must have been ages ago, and IIRC they were aimed a specific something that had happened at the time I wrote them. Probably of no relevance here.