He has a choice: Either he supported the message of the newsletter that he paid to have put out with his name and his byline, or he had no clue about the contents of the newsletter that he paid to put out with his name and his byline.
Either way, he's incompetent to hold an office higher than dogcatcher.
(And he STILL EMPLOYS the entire staff of his newsletter. They run his campaign in Texas. Go ahead, look up the names.)
no subject
Either way, he's incompetent to hold an office higher than dogcatcher.
(And he STILL EMPLOYS the entire staff of his newsletter. They run his campaign in Texas. Go ahead, look up the names.)