Stuff and nonsense
Blog: |
Mat Bowles |
Topics: |
politics, humour, miscellania |
Here's the legal text:
Printed by Dreamwidth LLC, Maryland, USA. Published and promoted by Mat Bowles (Liberal Democrat) of Brighouse, West Yorkshire.
Friends
Profiles
Blogs & stuff I read
Page generated Jul. 20th, 2025 09:48 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 05:37 pm (UTC)Disagree that it's "right wing". It's further to the right of either of us, but it's centrist rather than right—the current consensus is centrist, corporatist and vaguely authoritarian.
I don't see the positioning as 'centrist'—the positioning is Liberal, which is neither left nor right on the 20C scale but opposed to the current corporatist consensus (which is why Cameron's posturing works as all he has to be is more liberal than the Govt, he doesn't have to be a liberal as us).
It's a direct lift from the Power Commission report—I've got the full report in a book, they were giving htem away free, but it's on site, the Exec Summary is worth a read, from which: Not sure I'm sold on it completely, but note it's public funds (ie taxation) not donations, but under control of voters, and it can help smaller parties build up a local base, etc. It's a much better idea than the state funding solution proposed by the Big Two anyway.
Bulk of, not all of—he's very much aware of the problems in the US where this is the case. Note it's "the bulk of" not "all of"—it used to be that LAs took all business rates take, now it's centrally allocated, for example. Personally I'd bring in LVT and then have central grants for redistributive purposes, it's daft to raise most of an LAs budget nationally.