Entry tags:
Random linkage
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-syndicated.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-syndicated.gif)
Oy, journalists. Some people blog anonymously because they need to. Some people don't want their writing associated with their professional life. Get a clue, please?
Argentinian cooperatives show how you don't actually need capitalism to build an effective market economy (pay attention to the guy on the bike, he's cool). Given the above mentions that boy wizard thing, how about a report on a Harry Potter convention (by someone who, amusingly, had never heard of slashfic...). There's a bit on Samuel L's method acting for that film, and then we can finish on the evidence that I chose the wrong subject to blog about...
no subject
no subject
Sucks, but its just the way it is:(
no subject
Sucks, but its just the way it is:(
Oh, Harry Potter slash fiction = just plain wrong. ewwwwwe
no subject
She can't write anymore. The insight into her life is lost. Also, the anonymous people she wrote about, always referred to by a letter, have also lost their privacy.
All because a journalist wanted a spurious scoop that did zero for sales. Exposing someone is one thing, but removing from public discourse a writer and an insite that was interesting and, in many ways, remarkably moral?
That annoys me. It annoyed Robert as well, I once again found he'd written what I was going to when it turned up in my feed yesterday...
no subject
Very (very) freaky. But it did help me to understand the success of Brokeback Mountain a bit more.