matgb: (Webstuff)
Mat Bowles ([personal profile] matgb) wrote2007-08-01 02:20 pm

TFL's journeyplanner-messed up again guys?

I've mentioned the TFL and their sucky journeyplanner before, but now they've gone and done something really daft. I have journeyplanner.tfl.gov.uk bookmarked, as I like the advanced options like 'I only want bus routes' and similar. What do you get if you try to got here now? Under Construction. Um, that's not right, surely?

So I go to tfl.gov.uk and click the link there instead. I suddenly find myself with a new windo open (because I've not set all the options on this laptop properly it seems) and I'm going to a new site, journeyplanner.org. Mixed reactions, because if they've got a new site, they'r eimproving things, right? Except having used it a bit, it appears not. But also? Why will designers insist on opening new windows all the damn time? It remains one of the Top Ten Mistakes in Web Design:
Opening up new browser windows is like a vacuum cleaner sales person who starts a visit by emptying an ash tray on the customer's carpet. Don't pollute my screen with any more windows, thanks (particularly since current operating systems have miserable window management).

Designers open new browser windows on the theory that it keeps users on their site. But even disregarding the user-hostile message implied in taking over the user's machine, the strategy is self-defeating since it disables the Back button which is the normal way users return to previous sites.
It's such a bad idea, especially now with all the different browser platforms out there.

So, not only do approximately 1,780 incoming links to the old site no longer work, but they've broken basic usability rules, messed around with user expectations, yet still not actually improved the site in any way. What are they doing?

For the record, a small wishlist of things they could do to make the site usable:
  • Saved searches--it would be nice for the site to remember where I live, the mobile version will save searches, but isn't that a bit less useful given that the mobile version is more likely to be used away from home?
  • Easier preferences selection--I use the bus a lot, and sometimes the tube; as I don't go into town daily, I prefer to use Oyster pay-as-you-go, which means I don't take the train in. So it would be nice if I could set it to remember I prefer bus only routes, or bus+tube routes, rather than having to go down and deselect stuff all the time
  • Map links to online mapping resources--Making me download a PDF to look at where my local bus stop is is bloody stupid, especially given the preponderance of decent online mapping software these days, and it's of no use at all if I'm on my mobile browser
I could go on, and I've not even mentioned the Oyster log in problem--forgotten your password? After three attempts, it takes you to a lock out screen, that tells you to go to the front page and click the 'lost password' link. Sound plan, except... If you go to the frontpage, it redirects you to the error message you're trying to leave. Lovely.

Massive organisation, big investment budget, huge website with lots of data, and they appear to have not done a basic level usability study. Ah well. [livejournal.com profile] mooism? Are you still thinking about that project you mentioned?
ext_27841: (Default)

[identity profile] eldar.livejournal.com 2007-08-01 01:59 pm (UTC)(link)
I think the designers of an extranet I've been using this morning went to the same school as the TfL people.
ext_27841: (Default)

[identity profile] eldar.livejournal.com 2007-08-01 04:07 pm (UTC)(link)
I've just attempted to install the latest greatest software update from this same company.

It was downloaded as an iso image and burned to CD (never mind that it would've been quicker to drive/take a train to their offices, pick up a CD, and get back here than downloading the 400Mb+ of this release - and we're not talking about a company based in London or even the home counties here).

First I updated the client software. No problem. It complained it didn't like the server: no problem, that's next to be updated!

Except the server bit is screwed to high heaven with corrupt files all over the shop. Attempting to copy the whole lot to my local drive only highlighted even more corrupt files that my PC don't think are there. So now I have a client that won't talk to the server any more so there goes the rest of the day's planned development work.

(Never mind the reservations and gripes I have with this particular bit of software as a whole. I don't have a choice in the matter, we have clients who want us to interface with it so I have to work with it.)

(Sorry about the rant. I've spent the last few days banging my head against various people here with respect to this product and I'm getting very, very, annoyed.)

[identity profile] caramel-betty.livejournal.com 2007-08-01 05:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Only 7 but, even so, if people insist on running PHP running a supported version (with, you know, security patches and things) is nice.