US election candidates positions in one pretty graph

[matgb]

The Political Compass has an analysis of the candidates in the US Primaries 2007:

Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gravel are depicted on the extreme left in an American context, they would simply be mainstream social democrats within the wider political landscape of Europe. Similarly, Hillary Clinton is popularly perceived as a leftist in the United States while in any other western democracy her record is that of a moderate conservative.

and plots the candidates like so on the graph:

It's telling how close together they all are, and I concur completely with their analysis on it being linked to the electoral system. It also shows why I keep getting Kucinich on all those "who should you vote for" things that are kicking around.

Of course, the US media is even more biased than in the UK, and is almost completely beholden to corporate/advertiser interests; at least in the UK the press is following market positions at the same time as trying to affect that market (if anyone really thinks Murdoch backed Blair for political reasons then they really weren't paying attention). The result of this is that candidates coalesce around a media friendly center, but the media/mainstream is so far to the top/right that anyone else looks extreme. Ah well.

Land of the free, home of the brave. As long as the corporations are happy with you.

Comments

[miss-s-b.livejournal.com]

I keep getting Mr Chinnychinchin too.

[sylo-tode.livejournal.com]

When I did a survey in 2004 that matched your political stance against the candidates, I got a 100% match with Kucinich (this did not include my opinion on eating meat or other superfluous concepts). Sharpton was second.

Bush was 0%.

[baseballchica03.livejournal.com]

I know HOW MUCH does this country suck? It may as well be a one party state for all the "change in power" matters.

[tyrell.livejournal.com]

I'm pretty amazed just how liberal Hillary shows up on there. Doesn't say good things for Barak or Biden.