Entry tags:
Capitalism: anti market?
The ever excellent
chris_dillow_fd has an excellent summary of the banks reaction to Northern Rock at Stumbling and Mumbling, and naturally I concur completely:
Which is why calling markets 'right wing' is both blinkered and stupid--markets are a tool, a means to an end, and are neutral on left/right alignment. But they are a fundamental tenet of a modern free society.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-syndicated.gif)
This episode shows that many bosses don't really believe in free markets. Instead, they are like the slaggiest single parent. They pretend to be victims, and expect the state to save people from the consequences of their own stupidity and promiscuity. Indeed, they are worseA large number of capitalist managers and owners pay lip service to markets, but when it comes down to it would rather not worry about that dangerous 'competition' stuff.
Which is why calling markets 'right wing' is both blinkered and stupid--markets are a tool, a means to an end, and are neutral on left/right alignment. But they are a fundamental tenet of a modern free society.
no subject
To use a crass analogy, it's a bit like when somebody is questioned on their politics and they reply that they have none. Invariably the 'neutral' position is actually a right-wing position. Neutrality in any economic, social or political system is a myth.