Mat, if you DO include fantasy as part of an "'all encompassing' classification" for SF, then I think it has to be understood that there is and has been over the last several decades at the very least an extremely large influx of female-authored material. And that's in addition to some very time-honored names, as well, such as Norton or Kurtz.
In fantasy, especially nowadays, I think the equivalence is rather close - certainly closer than people think. If I look in my latest copy of the Sci-Fi Book Club flier, I would NOT be surprised to find an actual predominance of ladies' names within, because of this. And when it comes to fantasy novels, my shelves are AT LEAST as populated with ladies' works as they are with gents'. The genre simply fits, and fits well.
It would fairer to say that there is a lack in hard SF - although I am aware of some few excellent writers ... but I wonder how much of this is simply a lack of INTEREST in writing in the particular genre as opposed to a more sinister reason?
I'd be pleased to debate this on a more exhaustive basis.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
momijizukamori
no subject
Date: 2007-Jun-21, Thursday 14:19 (UTC)In fantasy, especially nowadays, I think the equivalence is rather close - certainly closer than people think. If I look in my latest copy of the Sci-Fi Book Club flier, I would NOT be surprised to find an actual predominance of ladies' names within, because of this. And when it comes to fantasy novels, my shelves are AT LEAST as populated with ladies' works as they are with gents'. The genre simply fits, and fits well.
It would fairer to say that there is a lack in hard SF - although I am aware of some few excellent writers ... but I wonder how much of this is simply a lack of INTEREST in writing in the particular genre as opposed to a more sinister reason?
I'd be pleased to debate this on a more exhaustive basis.