Who seems to be on a one man crusade to rewrite the basic terms of the UK constitution in a way that it actually makes sense. Until he declared these constitutional laws to be superior, they weren't. Now, under the terms of his ruling, they are.
Legally, he's set a precedent. I don't agree with him, but legally, he's right, until it's overturned or we get a resolution.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
momijizukamori
no subject
Date: 2009-Feb-25, Wednesday 14:38 (UTC)Who seems to be on a one man crusade to rewrite the basic terms of the UK constitution in a way that it actually makes sense. Until he declared these constitutional laws to be superior, they weren't. Now, under the terms of his ruling, they are.
Legally, he's set a precedent. I don't agree with him, but legally, he's right, until it's overturned or we get a resolution.