Question 17 caught me out - which s the one in the FAQ they basically hold their hands up to and say 'fair cop'. I'm not entirely sure that their definition of rationality is the same as mine either - they seem to be holding rational as 'with concrete proof' which of course the world doesn't have. I think it's rational to believe in things which I can't actually prove - whereas they seem to see this as contradictory when I then say I don't beleive in God.
Still, it was kinda interesting, and I only slipped up in a couple of places.
no subject
Date: 2005-Nov-06, Sunday 01:36 (UTC)Still, it was kinda interesting, and I only slipped up in a couple of places.