amusing? Not really Ah. Ok then. That does explain the disconnect in the conversation; I find any clever use of a facility to be amusing, but then, you like Clarkson ;-)
it's interesting, and worrying, that the internet can be manipulated in such a way
Worrying? Look at the Slate article I linked above. It's not worrying that people understand how Google works and make use of it. Google is, inherently, a democratic medium. People think Blair's a liar, Google therefore takes this into account. That's good.
Besides, corrupting it is very difficult, hence my caveats to the above.
As for restaint and Chris McCullough? I google'd him, can hazard a gues; what'd he do, specifically?
no subject
Date: 2006-Jun-18, Sunday 22:29 (UTC)Ah. Ok then. That does explain the disconnect in the conversation; I find any clever use of a facility to be amusing, but then, you like Clarkson ;-)
Worrying? Look at the Slate article I linked above. It's not worrying that people understand how Google works and make use of it. Google is, inherently, a democratic medium. People think Blair's a liar, Google therefore takes this into account. That's good.
Besides, corrupting it is very difficult, hence my caveats to the above.
As for restaint and Chris McCullough? I google'd him, can hazard a gues; what'd he do, specifically?