I thought Shatner instantly, and then Shakespeare about half a second later. I suspect that my reason for thinking that way was because when I read it, I sounded it with a short "a" in my head. I therefore did an autocomplete based on the sound, which gave me "Shatner" and only then started doing an autocomplete based on the letters (which gave me Shakespeare). So I suspect that this is as much a selection for visual or auditory information processing as much as (if not more than) it is a test for geekhood or otherwise.
That's better than my answer to Jack, which was that he'd used the word Geek in the intro, instantly making me think of Shatner. I tried to keep my intro completely neutral, thus far, every vote is Shatner.
Eh? I wasn't trying to get 'one up' by suggesting this rather obscure William Sha*. It was another name which began that way (although this was about 5 minutes after I thought of Shakespeare).
The 'non-TV watching' bit was slightly misleading as Shakespeare usually belongs to the printed page whereas Shatner usually belongs to television.
That was me being snarky, not bitchy. Fred got it ;I was more answering the question and showing my bemusement, I had no idea Clunes had ever played a TV doctor becasue I'm out of touch, etc.
The funny thing is,for me, I didn't even think of Shatner until a bout 10 seconds later. I saw the quiz and thought "What, is this a test to see how many people know shakespeare's full name? How silly."
I hadn't grasped the interesting psychological undertones until I saw almost EVERYONE picking tner.
no subject
Date: 2006-Mar-28, Tuesday 11:03 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-Mar-28, Tuesday 11:28 (UTC)So far, no one has said Shakespeare, and that includes some literary types.
no subject
Date: 2006-Mar-28, Tuesday 11:04 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-Mar-28, Tuesday 11:38 (UTC)We're a bunch of geeks in denial methinks...
no subject
Date: 2006-Mar-30, Thursday 00:57 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-Mar-28, Tuesday 11:23 (UTC)I didn't even think of Shakespeare.
no subject
Date: 2006-Mar-28, Tuesday 11:44 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-Mar-28, Tuesday 12:08 (UTC)Seek even more help?
no subject
Date: 2006-Mar-28, Tuesday 13:39 (UTC)Young. Or simply TV addicted. Either way, my elitist non-tv watching 30+ness beats you.
no subject
Date: 2006-Mar-28, Tuesday 17:58 (UTC)Also, I saw it as a short 'a' too.
no subject
Date: 2006-Mar-29, Wednesday 10:27 (UTC)It's not quite MQ-able, as no one would understand, but it's good enough for my msn tagline.
Congrats!
no subject
Date: 2006-Mar-29, Wednesday 10:38 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-Mar-29, Wednesday 12:00 (UTC)The 'non-TV watching' bit was slightly misleading as Shakespeare usually belongs to the printed page whereas Shatner usually belongs to television.
no subject
Date: 2006-Mar-29, Wednesday 12:03 (UTC)kespeare
Date: 2006-Mar-30, Thursday 23:02 (UTC)I hadn't grasped the interesting psychological undertones until I saw almost EVERYONE picking tner.