Harman wins by playing the system better
2007-Jun-24, Sunday 16:36I said:
But most important aspect: Blears last place on barely 11% of the vote. Labour members renew my faith in humanity a little with that one, word has it there was a massive cheer when her elimination was announced.
Loads of politics posts in a row. Time for some frivolity methinks...
I hope for Johnson, but think Harman has a strong chance, and she made a blatent play for Cruddas's second prefs near the end,And after the results are called, we see that:
Electoral college resultsHer blatant grab for his support worked like a charm. Cruddas won the first round, but barely picked up any second preferences, Johnson was picking up more until close to the end, when Harman then jumped ahead with Jon's votes. Interesting times it seems. Lots of people on the Labour blogs bitching about the voting system, one even said it was "stalinist". To me it remains the best way of determining a result acceptable to all, allows for multiple candidates rather than requiring a stitch up before the actual vote and is invaluable in a close contest, as this undoubtedly was. It also shows that Harman knew to play for second and third preferences a lot more than others, apparently internal canvassing wasn't asking for preferences at wll--and the media constantly referring to it as a "complicated" system was really annoying me throughout.
Candidate 1st round 2nd round 3rd round 4th round 5th round Hilary Benn 16.40% 18.22% 22.33% Hazel Blears 11.77% Jon Cruddas 19.39% 20.39% 23.89% 30.06% Peter Hain 15.32% 16.42% Harriet Harman 18.93% 21.23% 25.88% 33.58% 50.43% ELECTED Alan Johnson 18.16% 23.74% 27.90% 36.35% 49.56%
But most important aspect: Blears last place on barely 11% of the vote. Labour members renew my faith in humanity a little with that one, word has it there was a massive cheer when her elimination was announced.
Loads of politics posts in a row. Time for some frivolity methinks...