Facebook: What Livejournal could've been
2007-Jun-01, Friday 00:37Very good article at ReadWriteWeb on the massive growth of Facebook:
innerbrat she made a good point to me that I hadn't considered; a lot of LJers are here for the journalling; keep in touch with friends behind a wall, etc. Facebook has that, and has been very cunning in the way they've built up. LJ always had it, but stopped developing in any coherent way a long time before 6A bought them out, and have now lost the curve. The potential new users for LJ are going to Facebook. And then some.
The recent fuss hasn't helped (
news has updates, still digesting it all and watching how things pan out). Livejournal had the best elements of a blogging platform, flexible privacy options that simply don't exist elsewhere, and the potential to be a good social network, much better than MySpace. They dropped the ball (I still think limiting the directory searches to paid users is the stupidest thing ever - new users need it, new users rarely pay until they get more involved), and now Facebook is massive. For a long time I had three tabs that I opened when I booted up Fx for the evening; Gmail, my friends page and my Wordpress dashboard. When I put the blog on hiatus, I removed the dashboard. I added Facebook about three weeks ago, and I'm now spending as much time trawling there as I am on LJ.
Now we have the new applications platform, with so much coolness. RSSbook, for example; I have a feed I like, I add it, I see which of my friends also has it, and also good feeds they like. I'm not sure I like the layout, but it's cool to see other things my friends are interested, in a much more userfriendly way than having to go look at profiles. Facebook may be The One True website. The best bit? Much of it is built on Open Source technology. In fact, some of the source code comes from Livejournal itself.
I still love the LJ community, but I've been saying for ages I planned to jump ship at least partially, and host my journal elsewhere. Given the recent mess, I don't trust the LJ higher ups at all; yes, the account suspended on my friends list is back, but a simple look at the interests should have said not needing suspension in the first place. Facebook has won the social network war, Wordpress and Blogger won the free blogging platform fight, what's left for LJ. Fandom? They're leaving.
Any site like this needs new users to keep feeding in, else it withers and slowly dies. LJ is dying, and the owners are helping kill it. Ah well.
As well as quantity, Facebook has on its side that it is a very sticky site - 50% of registered users come back to the site every day. Facebook is generating more than 40 billion page views per month, from 24 million "active" users - 50 pages per user every day, which is very very high. In comparative terms, Facebook is now the 6th most trafficked site in the U.S. and gets more page views than eBay.When last I saw
The recent fuss hasn't helped (
Now we have the new applications platform, with so much coolness. RSSbook, for example; I have a feed I like, I add it, I see which of my friends also has it, and also good feeds they like. I'm not sure I like the layout, but it's cool to see other things my friends are interested, in a much more userfriendly way than having to go look at profiles. Facebook may be The One True website. The best bit? Much of it is built on Open Source technology. In fact, some of the source code comes from Livejournal itself.
I still love the LJ community, but I've been saying for ages I planned to jump ship at least partially, and host my journal elsewhere. Given the recent mess, I don't trust the LJ higher ups at all; yes, the account suspended on my friends list is back, but a simple look at the interests should have said not needing suspension in the first place. Facebook has won the social network war, Wordpress and Blogger won the free blogging platform fight, what's left for LJ. Fandom? They're leaving.
Any site like this needs new users to keep feeding in, else it withers and slowly dies. LJ is dying, and the owners are helping kill it. Ah well.
no subject
Date: 2007-Jun-01, Friday 00:49 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-Jun-01, Friday 02:19 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-Jun-01, Friday 06:47 (UTC)Nah. People live for the drama.
no subject
Date: 2007-Jun-01, Friday 07:30 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-Jun-01, Friday 09:16 (UTC)Although I'm suspecting the posted notes feed may also be public, which would be weird.
Also? I used to have that icon as well...
no subject
Date: 2007-Jun-01, Friday 09:23 (UTC)A bit like the LJ friends page idea, but with more variety but less actual content. Fun though.
no subject
Date: 2007-Jun-01, Friday 11:09 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-Jun-01, Friday 11:18 (UTC)What got me was when I got an email I'd been added at work, logged in, and saw the picture of the guy sat behind me in the office. Cool, but freaky.
Here via NHW
Date: 2007-Jun-01, Friday 12:20 (UTC)However, Facebook is fantastic for organising things, because, since I'm at uni, everyone has an e-mail account and internet access and it's therefore cheaper than ringing and texting.
Facebook is also one of those nouns that's been verbed, much like google, which I also find really interesting.
no subject
Date: 2007-Jun-01, Friday 12:24 (UTC)As I can RSS any journal entries into facebook I don't see why I should leave LJ just yet.
Re: Here via NHW
Date: 2007-Jun-01, Friday 12:31 (UTC)I started using FB mostly for activist purposes, half of my friends are fellow LibDems, but I'm fairly hooked on it overall now. And yeah, it's becoming incredibly succesful, which I think is good. Partially because I can keep track of people I haven't seen or who would never LJ; like my sister, for example.
no subject
Date: 2007-Jun-01, Friday 12:35 (UTC)I met Debi in a club and got to know her through LJ; if I meet someone under similar circumstances today, it'll be more likely to be through Fb; this isn't a problem with me, but I do wish LJ hadn't dropped the ball (that's back in the Danga days - 6A have merely killed it completely.
no subject
Date: 2007-Jun-01, Friday 14:21 (UTC)New users will be immediately looking for people they already know. If you make it easy (like sending out requests to every member already in your email address book) you'll attract more people. While LJ makes it easy to get to know people once you're here, getting started is much more awkward. (If I didn't know IB's LJ handle it would have been almost impossible).
Myspazz is just a big competition to get the biggest friendslist, but never actually interact with any significant proportion of it. (Which just seems pointless to me).
While LJ will survive FB has already pretty much killed off Friends Reunited.
no subject
Date: 2007-Jun-01, Friday 21:26 (UTC)I also like the photo options on facebook - something that LJ sucks at quite frankly, as having to upload them on a different site and then link to is a pain in the proverbial. Facebook is definately far superior to Myspazz in content, design, reliability and privacy.
Facebook is the first site I've ever used my real name on - and it's quite nice as it does link very well into real life. Not planning on ditching LJ anytime soon but like having two different options to use.
no subject
Date: 2007-Jun-02, Saturday 08:06 (UTC)The root cause of the problem is the centralised control social networks on a single domain require. That'll always mean the many users are always at the mercy of the few running things. It may be good at site X for a while, but eventually site X will annoy you in ways you can't do anything about, and the bigger the site is the more locked into it you'll feel.
The solution is distributed networks. Someone will get a version right one day and the difference will be between living in an apartment and owning your own home.
no subject
Date: 2007-Jun-02, Saturday 10:08 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-Jun-09, Saturday 14:50 (UTC)Hopefully as the site develops they'll allow for filtering and post level security in the same was as LJ does, at some point I may even suggest it to them.
sorry for the delayed reponse though.
no subject
Date: 2007-Jun-09, Saturday 14:57 (UTC)But for now, a fairly good one platform model like Facebook is going to be where it's at; distributed networks requires users with technical skills; once we gcan get over that hurdle, then we'll be fine.
no subject
Date: 2007-Jun-09, Saturday 22:22 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-Jun-11, Monday 00:00 (UTC)I actually get my status updates on LJ via the miracle of RSS. Which makes it a lot more useful to me, I have to agree...
no subject
Date: 2007-Jun-15, Friday 23:13 (UTC)need help
Date: 2007-Dec-04, Tuesday 11:39 (UTC)Could you explain how to get it, please?
Thanks in advance.
Re: need help
Date: 2007-Dec-04, Tuesday 16:48 (UTC)