matgb: (Webstuff)
[personal profile] matgb
Depth: 1

Date: 2008-Apr-25, Friday 13:43 (UTC)
innerbrat: (wtf)
From: [personal profile] innerbrat
Well done!

The first lines strike me more as 100 really good novels famous for their first lines and/or opening imagery - because, for example, It was love at first sight isn't so much a noticeably fantastic line.

And where the Hell was Day of the Triffids?
Depth: 1

Date: 2008-Apr-25, Friday 14:27 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davegodfrey.livejournal.com
Why thank you...
Depth: 1

Date: 2008-Apr-25, Friday 15:09 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pmoodie.livejournal.com
Sky One to resurrect Blake's 7?

Oh dear. Just the fact that it's a Sky One production is setting off alarms in my brain. It should be The Beeb, if anyone.

Still, I might tune in if they get someone as hot as Jacqeline Pearce to play Serve-a-flan. :)
Depth: 1

Date: 2008-Apr-25, Friday 15:14 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pmoodie.livejournal.com
American Book Review :: 100 Best First Lines from Novels

Yay for there being a bit of Kurt Vonnegut, but boooo for there being no Raymond Chandler or Hunter S Thompson! :(
Depth: 1

Date: 2008-Apr-25, Friday 22:26 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] misscoollinda.livejournal.com
I heard about the masturbation/prostate link on Dan Savage's podcast this week. Has the church denied it yet? Any benefits to be found from female masturbation?
Depth: 3

Date: 2008-Apr-25, Friday 22:32 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] misscoollinda.livejournal.com
Great big smile on SB's face?

Well, that's a given ;)

When I was in catholic school, I remember the teacher telling us that girls could get pregnant from masturbating - that their bodies also produced sperm in small amounts. No, I didn't believe it.
Depth: 2

Date: 2008-Apr-26, Saturday 02:34 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stillcarl.livejournal.com
Chuckle. When I scroll over the link in my Friend's List and get the annoying SnapShots' popup, the advert beside the article is asking 'Should Hillary Quit?' There's endless paths you could go down with that one...
Depth: 4

Date: 2008-Apr-26, Saturday 11:15 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stillcarl.livejournal.com
I hate them too, but the view can be added-value in that they offer a quick, non-NZ view of a page for me. For instance, the Hillary advert changed when I clicked through to that page.

Any idea how they work? As they might provide a way to look at pages without leaving any digital fingerprints. (Ignoring that SnapShot knows you rolled over the link.)
Depth: 6

Date: 2008-Apr-26, Saturday 11:47 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stillcarl.livejournal.com
So they're maybe old pages showing up? Given you can run videos through them, I thought they may have been grabbed in real time. So probably not at all useful after all.
Depth: 2

Date: 2008-Apr-26, Saturday 12:40 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miss-s-b.livejournal.com
Nobody's going to do research into THAT! Who cares if there are any benefits to women enjoying themselves? Science is all about MEN!

...

It appears I'm in a bad mood today...
Depth: 3

Date: 2008-Apr-26, Saturday 13:01 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] misscoollinda.livejournal.com
You're absolutely right. I didn't realize that it was illegal to sell sex toys in some southern states (excuse me, I thought I was living in the 21st century!) I'm sure the thought behind it was "Only a MAN can satisfy a woman!" Someone asked Dan Savage about the proper disposal of used sex toys, in which he used his response to target a "news reporter" who set up a sting operation at sex toy store in Mississippi:

http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/SavageLove?oid=511122


The follow up:
"Oh, and speaking of Kandiss Crone, lots of readers wrote to the Jackson, Mississippi, teeveenewz reporter about her idiotic, sex-phobic "sting" of a sex-toy shop, and many were kind enough to CC me. A sampling of Savage Love readers' letters to Crone can be found at www.thestranger.com/savage/crone. In other sex-toys news, last week the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled Texas's ban on sex toys was unconstitutional. (Lawrence v. Texas just keeps on giving.) Mississippi is under the Fifth Circuit's jurisdiction, so it seems that sex toys are now legal in Jackson, Mississippi. Someone alert Kandiss? Kandiss@wlbt.net." You gotta love when people unite for a common purpose :D
Depth: 4

Date: 2008-Apr-26, Saturday 13:12 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miss-s-b.livejournal.com
As far as I understand, up until the currect ruling, the law in Texas was that you could stick whatever you liked up your bottom as long as it wasn't a penis; but you could ONLY stick a penis up your vagina.
Depth: 5

Date: 2008-Apr-26, Saturday 13:40 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] misscoollinda.livejournal.com
and people wonder why I'd never move to a southern state (I don't want to generalize, but look at these laws!) I don't care what people do in their house or what they stick where. That's their business. I'm sure the laws are based on anti-gay /pro- neanderthal-like male sentiment - Women MUST depend on a man for all needs. What would happen to the world if they didn't? *rolls eyes*
I'm trying to figure out the problem they have with what gay men do. Gay bedroom activities are not hurting the straight manly-men. Are the manly men jealous? I mean, I can see that they don't want the woman to use the vibrator. They want in on that action. But they don't want in on the gay action. I can only assume it's because they don't understand "gay" so it must be a bad thing and must be abolished.

I'm heartened to see the laws are finally changing. Then we can focus on REAL issues.
Depth: 6

Date: 2008-Apr-26, Saturday 13:46 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miss-s-b.livejournal.com
I think the mindset is If you don't agree with me, you are wrong, and abnormal, and your opinion must be changed by any means necessary. Whereas I don't mind people making up their own minds on whatever they like, as long as they afford me the same luxury. Of course, the problem is that people who don't want to let me make up my own mind often accuse me of hypocrisy when I object to them trying to change my mind on various matters, oblivious to their own hypocrisy.
Depth: 7

Date: 2008-Apr-26, Saturday 14:10 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] misscoollinda.livejournal.com
Well said! I wish more people would figure that out. I'm all for open discussion, as long people realize that the point is not to make you switch to one side. There is much to learn from hearing all sides.
In the end, be true to yourself.
Depth: 8

Date: 2008-Apr-26, Saturday 14:13 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miss-s-b.livejournal.com
Absolutely
Depth: 1

Date: 2008-Apr-26, Saturday 00:22 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] srk1.livejournal.com
I think the LDs could have done better than Paddick. By comparison with Ken, and even with Boris, he just comes across as an incredible lightweight. He'd probably excel on a borough council, but that's about it.

(Not that I wouldn't vote for him if I was a Londoner, hem hem.)
Depth: 3

Date: 2008-Apr-26, Saturday 23:58 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] srk1.livejournal.com
Definitely with the media training. But we shouldn't be in a position where our nominee for Mayor of London needs media training.

He'd be a good MPA chair, mind you.
Depth: 5

Date: 2008-Apr-27, Sunday 17:23 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] srk1.livejournal.com
He confirmed on QT that the Tories had asked him. He claimed that at that point he was already a member of the LDs but did suggest he had thought about taking up the Cons' offer.

Perhaps the type of campaign that the mayoralty demands is just not something the LDs are suited to. If so, it's another good argument against having mayors in the first place...

Profile

matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Default)
Mat Bowles

September 2021

S M T W T F S
   1234
567 891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 2025-May-30, Friday 04:31
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios