Hmm, the taste of Q readers.
2005-Sep-11, Sunday 19:30![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So, I read the headlines, and get this one:
Beatles hailed 'best of British'
and I go to read the full story. I mean, I love Day in the Life, it's a great song. But, um, the full top 10?
Oasis' Wonderwall at 3rd best song of all time? It's shite! The rest I can see as pretty good songs (especially good to see the Pistols there), but, well, most of them aren't 'of all time', they're 'since Rock music was invented', and even then it's dubious. Ah well, popular votes for all time categories are bound to get stupid results.
Beatles hailed 'best of British'
and I go to read the full story. I mean, I love Day in the Life, it's a great song. But, um, the full top 10?
1. A Day In The Life - The Beatles
2. Waterloo Sunset - The Kinks
3. Wonderwall - Oasis
4. God Save The Queen - Sex Pistols
5. Bohemian Rhapsody - Queen
6. My Generation - The Who
7. Angels - Robbie Williams
8. Life on Mars? - David Bowie
9. Sympathy For The Devil - Rolling Stones
10. Unfinished Sympathy - Massive Attack
Oasis' Wonderwall at 3rd best song of all time? It's shite! The rest I can see as pretty good songs (especially good to see the Pistols there), but, well, most of them aren't 'of all time', they're 'since Rock music was invented', and even then it's dubious. Ah well, popular votes for all time categories are bound to get stupid results.
no subject
Date: 2005-Sep-11, Sunday 12:28 (UTC)oh god. kill me now. where do they get these people from?!
i used to read Q. it was the obvious move after smash hits. however, it became a bit too 'lads-mag' for me. i have since moved on to word - it does films, books, music... everything really. and the articles are interesting - you might enjoy it mat, it's an intelligent magazine, they don't patronise their readers. sometimes i get bbc music too. far superior to classicfm.
no subject
Date: 2005-Sep-11, Sunday 12:40 (UTC)Tend to rely on the net for reviews these days, even if the review itself is from a print source.
no subject
Date: 2005-Sep-11, Sunday 12:55 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-Sep-11, Sunday 13:33 (UTC)