MySpace sucks: that's what its owner thinks
2008-Dec-05, Friday 23:01![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Rupert Murdoch bought MySpace a few years back. He likes to make money out of stupid people. His official biographer summarises his opinion of the site and its users:
jleach, who is The Independent's digital media editor.
I was planning on doing a whole "LJ has grown up and poached The Independent from Six Apart" post, but I haven't. So here we go. LJ has poached the Indy and is working on others. They were using the execrable TypePad service for their blogs, now they're on here. And promoting LJ to their readers and website users. So there's a big influx of slightly confused new users with the 'Independent Minds' logo as their default userpic. If you see it, be nice, a lot of them are all confused.
Oh, and my 'Livejournal is doomed' posts that used to be fairly regular aren't any more—the new owners, it seems, definitely 'get' what the site could be, and are working towards it. For the first time in years, we're back above a million active users per month now. That's awesome.
LJ is competing with the big boys of blogging now. And it looks like it could be winning.
I don’t think that’s true. I think it is—if you’re on MySpace now, you’re a [expletive] cretin. And you’re not only a [expletive] cretin, but you’re poor. Nobody who has beyond an 8th grade level of education is on MySpace. It is for backwards people.Which, in slightly less fragrent terms, is what I've read about the demographics of MySpace use as opposed to Facebook use (Livejournal demographics are a subset of the Facebook demographic, Facebook is used by educated people, LJ is used by educated goths, geeks and weirdoes). All of this via the excellent
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I was planning on doing a whole "LJ has grown up and poached The Independent from Six Apart" post, but I haven't. So here we go. LJ has poached the Indy and is working on others. They were using the execrable TypePad service for their blogs, now they're on here. And promoting LJ to their readers and website users. So there's a big influx of slightly confused new users with the 'Independent Minds' logo as their default userpic. If you see it, be nice, a lot of them are all confused.
Oh, and my 'Livejournal is doomed' posts that used to be fairly regular aren't any more—the new owners, it seems, definitely 'get' what the site could be, and are working towards it. For the first time in years, we're back above a million active users per month now. That's awesome.
LJ is competing with the big boys of blogging now. And it looks like it could be winning.
no subject
Date: 2008-Dec-05, Friday 23:07 (UTC)And, presumably, an educated goth, geek or weirdo. ;}P>
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-Dec-05, Friday 23:08 (UTC)I might just start to respect the guy.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-Dec-05, Friday 23:32 (UTC)Haha! Love it cause it's true.
I wish you'd tell the 4248924 odd people on my flist who always seem to be constantly complaining that LJ is going down the pan what you've said in this post.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-Dec-06, Saturday 00:08 (UTC)I felt SO very good at deleting my MySpace not so long ago. It was like finally escaping from that group of high school posers that you don't know how you started hanging out with them in the first place.
no subject
Date: 2008-Dec-06, Saturday 01:42 (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-Dec-06, Saturday 09:16 (UTC)On the resurgence of livejournal - they seem to be making some really positive move, both in terms of getting new people in (through the indy etc) but also with their infrastructure being made more secure.
no subject
Date: 2008-Dec-06, Saturday 13:47 (UTC)While trying to sort out the links on that post, I accidentally deleted the post. Could you repeat your comment please? I'd like it on record. :)
no subject
Date: 2008-Dec-07, Sunday 14:09 (UTC)It also seems to be being sensibly run these days - no mass deletions and what have you. Plus it's no longer in imminent danger of falling into the San Andreas fault, which is reassuring.
no subject
Date: 2008-Dec-08, Monday 17:06 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-Dec-07, Monday 14:44 (UTC)