On memes and bloody useless software...
2005-Jan-13, Thursday 20:29There's nothing wrong witht he code that caused the last post to mess up completely, at least not that I can see. Ah well, deleted the offending meme.
Meh, on the subject, the show-off intellectual in me wants to know, without looking it up, how many people actually know
a) what a meme actually is
and
b) who created the term.
PaulJ and I used to talk about the theory incessently while we lived in Exeter, now everyone's using the word and I'm curious. Did oyu know the theory before you started using it in LJ, do you know it now, is meme just another cool word you ue without knowledge?
None of this matters, of course, but, y'know...
Meh, on the subject, the show-off intellectual in me wants to know, without looking it up, how many people actually know
a) what a meme actually is
and
b) who created the term.
PaulJ and I used to talk about the theory incessently while we lived in Exeter, now everyone's using the word and I'm curious. Did oyu know the theory before you started using it in LJ, do you know it now, is meme just another cool word you ue without knowledge?
None of this matters, of course, but, y'know...
no subject
Date: 2005-Jan-13, Thursday 12:37 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-Jan-13, Thursday 12:40 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-Jan-13, Thursday 12:44 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-Jan-13, Thursday 13:24 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-Jan-13, Thursday 13:22 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-Jan-13, Thursday 13:24 (UTC)I suspect that the unwillingness of the social science communities to use, or even contemplate, scientific analogies to dynamic systems is a symptom of the same underlying statistical sloppiness that makes people think that sans-serif fonts are more readable, and that it's "scientifically proven" to be so...
As for the coining of the word, I first encountered it used by Terry Pratchett, to describe a then-fictional future science in Strata - however, Pratchett is astoundingly well-read in popular science, so I expect he lifted it from a more scholarly source.
no subject
Date: 2005-Jan-13, Thursday 13:41 (UTC)Had forgotten it was "mental gene" though.
Oh, Huggy? It's pronounced meeem (well, that's how Dawkins says it, it's his word, so I think he wins on points).
Think I'll re read Strat at some point; ight need to buy a copy though, IIRC the one I read was borrowed...
no subject
Date: 2005-Jan-13, Thursday 13:54 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-Jan-14, Friday 02:34 (UTC)And in answer to your question Mat, I had no idea of the term before I started using LJ in Summer, but it didn't take me long to ask when I realised there was a word being used that I didn't know where it came from...
no subject
Date: 2005-Jan-14, Friday 11:54 (UTC)It's one of those things that gets to me, people who do stuff they don't understand and make no effort to do so either.
I can respect the "don't know, won't use it" attitude, but prefer the "interesting..." attitude.
You coming to any of the GameSoc stuff tomorrow?
no subject
Date: 2005-Jan-14, Friday 14:18 (UTC)It's not that I won't be out of bed by 10am, just that I'd rather get up slowly and not have to rush anywhere!
I'm currently tackling that "interesting" attitude and desperately trying to decide if I want to go ahead and do a PhD (of the paid variety)...