Philistines! Citizen Kane...
2007-Jan-05, Friday 08:58![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Right, yesterday I posted that top 100 films of the first 100 years of filmaking meme. It appears that many of you have yet to see the film at #1. It was bad enough that
grrliz hadn't seen it, she posts more about films than she does about Harry Potter and web design, but you lot? You're supposed to be cultured people damnit!
Look, here's the deal. Citizen Kane. When the BFI's Sight and Sound calls it the best film ever every decade for four decades in a row, that ought to tell you something, right? Even the Americans finally got the right idea eventually. Gah!
[Poll #900871]
I dunno, I thought a few of you might possible have seen it...
In other news, my plans to rehost the journal elsewhere proceed apace, the more I use Wordpress the more impressed I am, and the
lj2wordpress project has given a number of useful plugins (especially LivePress). For now though, it'll be somewhere to host the CV et al. Need to style it, but the upload crapped out on me a bit too often for me to be in the mood today. Car's in the shop as well, hopefully might be back on the road tomorrow...
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Look, here's the deal. Citizen Kane. When the BFI's Sight and Sound calls it the best film ever every decade for four decades in a row, that ought to tell you something, right? Even the Americans finally got the right idea eventually. Gah!
[Poll #900871]
I dunno, I thought a few of you might possible have seen it...
In other news, my plans to rehost the journal elsewhere proceed apace, the more I use Wordpress the more impressed I am, and the
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
no subject
Date: 2007-Jan-05, Friday 10:15 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-Jan-05, Friday 20:37 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-Jan-05, Friday 10:30 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-Jan-05, Friday 20:40 (UTC)And/or I forgot, along with two other options...
no subject
Date: 2007-Jan-06, Saturday 01:46 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-Jan-06, Saturday 01:57 (UTC)So, y'know, get to it. Having said that, polls do seem to be popular, over 30 votes so far, that's more than I usually get.
no subject
Date: 2007-Jan-05, Friday 10:51 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-Jan-05, Friday 20:41 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-Jan-05, Friday 11:42 (UTC)I found it an entirely uninspiring and unremarkable film. Not bad, per se, but nothing that would particularly hold my attention. Of course, I'm well aware that the viewing conditions were far from ideal, and I quite possibly ought to try to see it again under better conditions, but the initial exposure prejudiced my views, so I can't seem to bring myself to do so.
no subject
Date: 2007-Jan-05, Friday 20:44 (UTC)If you like films, try to give it another viewing, just because it's worth it just to play spot the influence, so many films rip it off in one way or another watching the source is worth the effort. Bit like Python, not as funny as when they started, but mostly because we've seen it all in a more modern approach.
no subject
Date: 2007-Jan-05, Friday 12:36 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-Jan-05, Friday 20:45 (UTC)Just goes to show, this is why journalists have editors.
no subject
Date: 2007-Jan-05, Friday 12:47 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-Jan-05, Friday 20:46 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-Jan-05, Friday 12:47 (UTC)*hides*
no subject
Date: 2007-Jan-05, Friday 20:47 (UTC)I dunno. Still, at least you actually have seen it.
no subject
Date: 2007-Jan-06, Saturday 08:54 (UTC)I REGRET NOTHING!!
no subject
Date: 2007-Jan-05, Friday 17:11 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-Jan-05, Friday 20:48 (UTC)But, still, I have enlightened someone, yay!
no subject
Date: 2007-Jan-14, Sunday 05:18 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-Jan-14, Sunday 18:37 (UTC)Weird.
no subject
Date: 2007-Jan-14, Sunday 19:10 (UTC)Does dance...