Fair, balanced, but most certainly not honest

[matgb]

Via a comment at theweaselking's, it transpires that The Media Can Legally Lie:

In a stunningly narrow interpretation of FCC rules, the Florida Appeals court claimed that the FCC policy against falsification of the news does not rise to the level of a "law, rule, or regulation," it was simply a "policy." Therefore, it is up to the station whether or not it wants to report honestly.

During their appeal, FOX asserted that there are no written rules against distorting news in the media. They argued that, under the First Amendment, broadcasters have the right to lie or deliberately distort news reports on public airwaves.

That's Rupert Murdoch's Fox network there, the equivalent of the Times, Sun, News of the World and Sky. Honesty is not a requirement in reporting, merely ratings.

Having picked up a copy of the Evening Standard for the first time today, it looks like Associated share the same policy in their reporting as well.

Comments

[ginasketch.livejournal.com]

In other news:

The sun rose today.

[matgb]

Yeah, I know, but I wasn't aware they'd acknowledged it as a specific policy...

[ginasketch.livejournal.com]

The world gets more and more retarded everyday i'm afraid.

Lets put our heads between our legs and kiss our arses goodbye.

(that wasn't meant to sound that dodgy.)

[tiredstars.livejournal.com]

I remember this story, in particular for the Fox station manager's statement: "We Paid $3 Billion For These Stations. We'll Decide What the News Is."

[tyrell.livejournal.com]

That's kinda beautiful. And yet, incredibly depressing.

[paulatpingu.livejournal.com]

Which fits nicely with rulings already made on the advertising industry:

"In 2004, a Dutch court ruled that Wilkinson Sword and Gillette could both claim their razors were the best, as members of the public would probably not believe them anyway."

From the BBC

So the media lies because it constitutionally can, and advertising lies because people know it to be false. Yay for lying I say...

[singanathema.livejournal.com]

During the start of the Iraq war The Mirror ran a a story about some innocent civilians being killed by a stray bomb and printed next to it a picture of the supposed aftermath. My eagle eyes had spotted the same picture in a TV documentary a week previously and it was actually the result of an Iranian missile attack many years before.
My Dad phoned the paper to complain and they admitted that it wasn't recent but that the hadn't done anything wrong as it was merely for 'illustrative purposes.'