Sanity versus "biblical truth"
2007-Nov-29, Thursday 01:22![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Quickie, aimed specifically at two people[1] but of general interest to all who value decent science education,
nannyo excellent post about her encounter with the people that run the Noah’s Ark Zoo Farm. I am very scared that that place exisits within the UK. On a similar vein, those that haven't seen it should probably read Scalzi's report of his visit to the Creation Museum. Does anyone have any brain bleach?
Heh: I do like this from the comments at Scalzi's report though:
ETA:
innerbrat has put on her day job hat and got into contact with them, removing the bit that she studies evolutionary morphology from her NHM email sigline. Go Debi!
[1]
innerbrat and
davegodfrey based on their regular postings on such topics.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Heh: I do like this from the comments at Scalzi's report though:
Galatians 4:24So, um, the bible, if literally true, is literally a metaphor according to St Paul?
These things may be taken figuratively, for the women represent two covenants.
ETA:
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
[1]
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
no subject
Date: 2007-Nov-29, Thursday 09:34 (UTC)The scientific discussion about evolution is not that it is happening at all, the proof of that is all around us, and incontravertible. The discussion is about HOW evolution is happening. Is it all selection? Is it neutral? Punctuated? Does the "noncoding" genetic material do something we don't understand yet?
no subject
Date: 2007-Nov-29, Thursday 11:40 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-Nov-29, Thursday 13:19 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-Nov-29, Thursday 14:43 (UTC)5. In the abstract (without article): Systematic conception or statement of the principles of something; abstract knowledge, or the formulation of it: often used as implying more or less unsupported hypothesis (cf. 6): distinguished from or opposed to practice (cf. 4b). in theory (formerly in the theory): according to theory, theoretically (opp. to in practice or in fact).
6. In loose or general sense: A hypothesis proposed as an explanation; hence, a mere hypothesis, speculation, conjecture; an idea or set of ideas about something; an individual view or notion. Cf. 4.
which are not the meaning intended in the phrase the Theory of Evolution. This one is
4. a. A scheme or system of ideas or statements held as an explanation or account of a group of facts or phenomena; a hypothesis that has been confirmed or established by observation or experiment, and is propounded or accepted as accounting for the known facts; a statement of what are held to be the general laws, principles, or causes of something known or observed.
its a shame most people don't get this
no subject
Date: 2007-Nov-29, Thursday 23:12 (UTC)