Blimey—web stats and site weirdness
2008-Jun-28, Saturday 19:14![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
matgbSo, my web host package for TaKtiX expires on Tuesday, so given I'm barely using it I'm backing it all up to prepare to move it all to a cheaper server.
While downloading the entire HTML content I found that the server stats programme provided by my host backs up the stats page monthly. This I knew not. Oops. So I read them through, and realise that I've been misreading them a bit. I thought they were cumulative in that programme, but they're not. Most read are the various feeds the site releases. After that are the graphics I use here on my journal. Next up? Well, this surprised me, so I dug out the old Statcounter account.
For the non-Voting parts of the site, there are about 700 visitors per month. Thing is? Half of them go to one page. Mr![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
mapp? Your old review of the Tau Codex gets about 350 readers a month. Still. Virtually all from Google.
Shame I don't play Warhammer based stuff anymore, appears there's some decent ad revenue to be made reviewing the books if a two year old review can still get that many readers...
While downloading the entire HTML content I found that the server stats programme provided by my host backs up the stats page monthly. This I knew not. Oops. So I read them through, and realise that I've been misreading them a bit. I thought they were cumulative in that programme, but they're not. Most read are the various feeds the site releases. After that are the graphics I use here on my journal. Next up? Well, this surprised me, so I dug out the old Statcounter account.
For the non-Voting parts of the site, there are about 700 visitors per month. Thing is? Half of them go to one page. Mr
mapp? Your old review of the Tau Codex gets about 350 readers a month. Still. Virtually all from Google.Shame I don't play Warhammer based stuff anymore, appears there's some decent ad revenue to be made reviewing the books if a two year old review can still get that many readers...
