PSA: Get your flu jabs ASAP
2010-Dec-25, Saturday 17:38![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Last night was the worst night of my adult life. The fever finally broke at about 4am, and by 6am I could feel the medications I'd been dosing myself on actually take effect.
I work with kids. If I'd thought about it, I should've known to go get a flu jab, the thing is, every dose of flu I've had up to now has been a mild form of "knock you out for a few days, Lemsip'll help" type.
This dose of flu? Bloody awful. I've had it since last Sunday, thought I was getting over it Thursday, only to have it kick back in with a vengeance Friday afternoon. Apparently, total number of cases this year is about normal but the Govt is being criticised for not spending enough money on an advertising campaign to get people to go get their jabs.
Me? I always wondered why spending money on adverts for this sort of thing were needed. We have newspapers, TV news, radio news, etc. Govt ministers could simply push it as a news item and get the media to cover as an essential public interest story.
And those of us with some method of communicating news could help spread that message. Right?
Does this actually make sense, or is my brain so flu addled it's coming up with daft ideas again? If I'm right, feel free to link to this post, write your own, tweet it, share it on Facebook, etc. If I'm wrong, well, y'know, my brain is barely working.
Oh yeah. Merry Christmas. You're not supposed to take alcohol alongside a chunk of the pills I'm using to take the worst off. So I'm stone cold sober watching The One Ronnie. I think being sober is a mistake for this one.
I work with kids. If I'd thought about it, I should've known to go get a flu jab, the thing is, every dose of flu I've had up to now has been a mild form of "knock you out for a few days, Lemsip'll help" type.
This dose of flu? Bloody awful. I've had it since last Sunday, thought I was getting over it Thursday, only to have it kick back in with a vengeance Friday afternoon. Apparently, total number of cases this year is about normal but the Govt is being criticised for not spending enough money on an advertising campaign to get people to go get their jabs.
Me? I always wondered why spending money on adverts for this sort of thing were needed. We have newspapers, TV news, radio news, etc. Govt ministers could simply push it as a news item and get the media to cover as an essential public interest story.
And those of us with some method of communicating news could help spread that message. Right?
Does this actually make sense, or is my brain so flu addled it's coming up with daft ideas again? If I'm right, feel free to link to this post, write your own, tweet it, share it on Facebook, etc. If I'm wrong, well, y'know, my brain is barely working.
Oh yeah. Merry Christmas. You're not supposed to take alcohol alongside a chunk of the pills I'm using to take the worst off. So I'm stone cold sober watching The One Ronnie. I think being sober is a mistake for this one.
no subject
Date: 2010-Dec-25, Saturday 17:57 (UTC)Get well as soon as you can! =)
no subject
Date: 2010-Dec-25, Saturday 18:48 (UTC)I'm certainly very much supportive of the at-risk groups being innoculated, but I've not seen anything suggesting it for everyone. If there is, fair enough.
no subject
Date: 2010-Dec-25, Saturday 19:06 (UTC)But it'd be up to Doctors to decide who should get a jab, and I think everyone should be encouraged to ask.
no subject
Date: 2010-Dec-25, Saturday 23:56 (UTC)I think that those groups and the fact that those groups should be getting the jab should be rather more heavily publicised. I agree that if someone is worried/unsure they should be able to go and check if they should have it. I don't agree that everyone should go and ask a doctor about it, as I don't see it as an efficient use of time if you sufficiently publicise what the at-risk groups are and get those people to get done.
no subject
Date: 2010-Dec-25, Saturday 21:11 (UTC)As to advertising - I'm surprised the pharmaceutical companies don't do it. But then if the govt. will do their advertising for free, why bother?
no subject
Date: 2010-Dec-25, Saturday 21:17 (UTC)Ergo, pharma companies get no benefit at all from advertising. It hadn't occured to me before because, frankly, I've never had flu this bad before. Plus this is the first time I've been working with kids during a bad outbreak, apparently this years seasonal flus are a bit worse, and Swine Flu is finally actually doing damage in the UK.
no subject
Date: 2010-Dec-25, Saturday 22:06 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-Dec-25, Saturday 22:06 (UTC)