I don't think, in this case, that it's a google bomb; I think it's more likely the company knows they've got a good page rank and is using it to get hits for daftly named toys.
I'm always google bombing as you know, but you only need to do that to get non-highly ranked pages up and/or completely irrelevent terms.
In this case, the product is called the search term, that's not bombing, it's great optimisation. Cool though.
no subject
Date: 2005-Dec-27, Tuesday 07:26 (UTC)On the other hand, ewwwwwww!!!
no subject
Date: 2005-Dec-27, Tuesday 17:38 (UTC)My work here is done.
no subject
Date: 2005-Dec-27, Tuesday 12:42 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-Dec-27, Tuesday 18:14 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-Dec-27, Tuesday 15:28 (UTC)I wonder how many 'links to' it takes to googlebomb something like that to the top of the list.
no subject
Date: 2005-Dec-27, Tuesday 17:06 (UTC)I'm always google bombing as you know, but you only need to do that to get non-highly ranked pages up and/or completely irrelevent terms.
In this case, the product is called the search term, that's not bombing, it's great optimisation. Cool though.
no subject
Date: 2005-Dec-28, Wednesday 02:34 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-Dec-28, Wednesday 02:39 (UTC)I know it's cold, but I'm sure satan isn't snowballing. Like the icon...
no subject
Date: 2005-Dec-28, Wednesday 09:56 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-Dec-28, Wednesday 14:07 (UTC)I like your new userinfo BTW, pic of you and