LJ- oh, teh drama!11!!1
2006-Apr-11, Tuesday 21:58It all started with a post to
Go read the link, but on the grounds the
I guess I don't get the entirely 'friends only' approach to LJ. It sort of makes sense if you only ever post personal stuff, but is everything always so deeply personal?
Hear ye, hear ye!
Listen now to the1. I add you first. Not vice versa.
2. If you do add me before I add you, I reserve the right to explore your journal and see whether you're worth adding.
3. If I don't see anything that makes me suspicious, you're in. Congratulations.
4. If there is material that is offensive to me, or to anyone on my Flist, I will request that you defriend me. Please do so immediately.
5. If, however, you have no entries in your journal for me to read, you have no business owning an account in the first place. You will not be added.
6. A note to Christians and Republicans: I don't get along with you. In order to avoid conflict, please do not under any circumstances add me.
7. Since I am an intelligent woman, and all of my friends are equally intelligent, I prefer that only the intelligent add me. People with IQs that dip into the negative strata are not welcome.
8. I reserve the right to defriend at will, with or without warning. Usually with.
9. If you say or do anything that I consider repulsive while on my Flist, or you do or say something that one of my friends would find offensive, you will be informed that your behavior is unacceptible. You will also be removed from my Flist immediately. If the offense is bad enough, you will even be banned.
10. My journal is Friends-only for a reason. Friendships are based on trust. Please show discretion and courtesy toward my entries. I will gladly do likewise.
11. If you should ever decide that you must defriend me, please do not leave a comment explaining your reasons. I'm not that interested, and it will only lead to conflict.
12. If you have a problem with my entries (which would make you either a fundamentalist Christian or a conservative Republican), don't feed me your little hissy fit. You're not as special as you think you are.
13. If you're younger than sixteen, please behave yourself. I'm not your babysitter.
14. This journal is rated R.
Thank you for your time.
And if you have posted something entirely friends only, where are you going to get new lj-friends from? Surely if it's someone you don't actually know, you're going to want to read a bit before you 'add' them? If it's one post alone? Unless it's someone I know or a recommendation, I just go away again.
But that list of 'requirements'? Including 'don't add me first', despite posting entirely friends only? What we have there is an example of "I don't read the FAQ or indeed think for myself". Now, probably because of this silly list, someone is setting up spammy joke acconts and friending her with them. So, to respond to this, she's suggested LJ change its structure as a "security risk". Newsflash! Someone lj-friending you doesn't affect you in any way.
Since I am an intelligent woman, and all of my friends are equally intelligent, I prefer that only the intelligent add me.Right. We hold these things to be self evident. Merely stating this in this way invalidates the claim, n'est ce pas?
Ah well. People. Not always clever.
For those out there reading this that are entirely friends only, is there a reason why? If you write a film review, or a quick link/discuss on a news story, why f-lock it? I favour the mixture approach myself, it makes more sense to me.
no subject
Date: 2006-Apr-11, Tuesday 14:40 (UTC)But having said that, I add everyone who asks me to add them, so I guess it's all kinda pointless. XDD That woman sounds quite up herself though, as if it'd be an honour to have her added or something.
A lot of my earlier posts are unlocked and I'm working on making them all friends only, the only reason being because all of my recent posts are friends only and I like everything to be neat and together. Why am I completely f-locked now? Mainly because I don't like the idea that anyone could type in my URL and read my bitchings and rantings, especially if it concerns them. I don't know, I think I just like to know who's reading my journal, I guess.
no subject
Date: 2006-Apr-11, Tuesday 14:41 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-Apr-11, Tuesday 14:46 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-Apr-11, Tuesday 14:53 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-Apr-11, Tuesday 15:00 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-Apr-11, Tuesday 14:53 (UTC)You ended a comment with yo?
*goes to cut*
*thinks better of it*
You're right though, we have not much in common other than locality and internet obsessions. But thou, mostly, amuse me.
And at some point I may make use of your ability to actually understand the S2 editing system...
no subject
Date: 2006-Apr-11, Tuesday 14:56 (UTC)And S2? I'm an S1 whore, all the way...
no subject
Date: 2006-Apr-11, Tuesday 14:58 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-Apr-11, Tuesday 15:01 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-Apr-11, Tuesday 15:11 (UTC)I want to amend my current style myself, by looking at how it works and changing it. Huge advantage of Blogger is the way you can mess around with the template if'n you want to.
Ah well. I'll stick to this one for a bit, it works, and the tweaks are quite nice.
no subject
Date: 2006-Apr-13, Thursday 02:21 (UTC)>_>
no subject
Date: 2006-Apr-13, Thursday 04:35 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-Apr-13, Thursday 04:51 (UTC)S1 is easier to customise beyond what's available for each style, though. To really edit a style in S2 requires wading in through the code, while S1, IIRC from my use of it, can be done with generic knowledge of HTML and CSS.
The easiest style in S2 to customise in Flexible Squares (which I am in the process of editing for mine, and which many of my RP journals have un-edited) because it lets you use an external CSS, but S1 is still more flexible that way.
S2, though gives a more cohesive journal, IMO, which is why I am its bitch.
(although I want to know how Mat got that toolbar at the top of his layout. I may have to snaffle it)
no subject
Date: 2006-Apr-13, Thursday 04:57 (UTC)Edit userinfo, turns the new toolbar on. Custom styles need to be amended to get it to display, for which
I'm using the Nebula standard theme, so all I had to do was click 'on'.
no subject
Date: 2006-Apr-13, Thursday 05:00 (UTC)'Course, I've lost the respect I had for you as a 1337 LJ Style h4x0r (OK< I give up, I can't pull it off)
But still, awesome. Ta.
no subject
Date: 2006-Apr-13, Thursday 05:08 (UTC)What I can't do is LJ. Yet.
no subject
Date: 2006-Apr-13, Thursday 05:17 (UTC)(
Or spend the Easter weekend just prodding at the layer. S'really not that complicated; the hardest part is tracking down the relevant property names, as the online documentation's not all that easy to navigate at first.
no subject
Date: 2006-Apr-13, Thursday 12:19 (UTC)Is that when the rest of the country have 4 days off and us service sector types forget to check what's open or pay bills early?
What I can't figure out is actually where to start, whenver I get an 'edit' page it's not actually telling me anything that I can change of any use.
Which is why I don't bother; show me the code, I'll mess with it, but I can't find them.
Admittedly, not actually bothered looking to hard, I'm spending time sorting out the new sites.
Ought to figure out a way to make comments work better in this theme though, never had 40 comments on a post since I switched. not sure I've ever had 40 comments.
Weird. LJ drama seems to be a popular discussion point...
no subject
Date: 2006-Apr-13, Thursday 12:42 (UTC)Go here. That's from manage -> customise -> advanced customisation -> public layers -> Nebula
There's your code for Nebula. Copy it.
Then go here.
That's from advanced customisation -> Your layers.
Create Top Level Layer: Layout. Click 'create'
Paste your code.
Then tinkle!
(*cough* Obviously tinkling isn't that easy, mind)
no subject
Date: 2006-Apr-11, Tuesday 14:48 (UTC)But if it's a random funny with no rants or mentions of others/real life?
It was an open post of yours that I first read that prompted me to say hello IIRC, I'd always keep some poublic posts up just so people can get a 'feel'.
If it's a 'journal' entry, then knowing whp's reading it makes sense. But a 'funny' post or a 'blog' style post?
Meh. I just found her list of rules so daft they needed sharing.